艺推: 开通会员 艺查网 美术百科
当前位置:美术网 > 美术网学术库 > 名作 > 书法作品欣赏

柳公权行书兰亭诗卷(传)-唐朝-行书

书法作品欣赏 浏览 李艳霞 美术网

《兰亭诗》卷,传唐柳公权书,绢本,行书,纵26.5厘米,横365.3厘米。

  《兰亭诗》卷释文

  本幅无款印。

  卷前引首清乾隆皇帝行书题“笔谏遗型”,题签“兰亭八柱第四”,题记一段。又有瘦金体题签“唐柳公权书群贤诗”。

  卷后有宋邢天宠、杨希甫、习之、蔡襄(后添)、李处益、孙大年、王易、黄伯思(伪)、宋适,金王万庆,明王世贞(两段)、莫是龙文嘉、张凤翼,清王鸿绪等题跋和观款。

  鉴藏印有宋“御书”、“双龙”、“宣和”、“政和”、“内府图书”、“奉华宝藏”、“内府书印”、“睿思东阁”(以上均伪),以及宋“绍兴”,元“乔篑成氏”、“柯九思”(均墨印),明王世贞,清高士奇、王鸿绪、乾隆内府诸印。

  此书传是柳公权所书东晋穆帝永和九年(353年)三月三日,王羲之谢安、孙绰等人在浙江绍兴兰亭集会时与会者所赋的37首诗及诗序。

  诗后的题跋有的是真迹,有的是伪作。明以后的题跋都是原有的,明以前的题跋除蔡襄、黄伯思外都是真迹,但全是后配,与本卷无关。

  本卷笔法僵硬粗糙,且多枯锋,但较自然率易。卷后之宋代黄伯思尾题(伪)中云“传柳书”,细观之,个别字的用笔明显不是出自柳书,如:孙统四言诗中的“希”字、庾友四言诗中的“则”字、王涣之四言诗中的“足”字等末笔写的非常丑怪,字的结体亦多不沉稳,较浮躁,与柳氏所书王献之《送梨帖》后之题跋墨迹对比不但笔法不类,连结体也无丝毫相同之处。从诗文看,颇有不通处,如:把孙绰四言诗“怀彼伐木”误书为“怀彼代水”,把谢安四言诗“伊昔夫子”误书为“伊昔先子”。“伐木”是《诗经》中语,“夫子”是指孔丘,说明书写者是一位文墨不够精通之人。无论从艺术特征还是艺术水平来分析,该卷决非柳公权之笔。

  此卷也并非晚至宋代的抄本。从所录37首诗中可看出,个别用字不避宋讳,如谢安诗中“契慈玄执,寄教林丘”的“玄”字、王肃之诗中“嘉会欣时游,豁朗畅心神”的“朗”字等都没有避北宋始祖皇帝赵玄朗之讳。从书法的主体风格看,推测应写于唐代,与杜牧墨迹《张好好诗卷》大略相近,并且是信笔直书,不是临仿得来。作为唐抄古本,此卷与敦煌遗书中《文选·陆机短歌行等残卷》(伯2554)、《玉台新咏卷第二残卷》(伯2503)有同样的文学价值,不独书法耳。

  宋《宝章待访录》,明《东图玄览》、《清河书画舫》、《清河见闻表》,清《珊瑚网书凭》、 《式古堂书画汇考》、《大观录》、《石渠宝笈·续编》、《石渠随笔》著录。 

 

--------Introduction in English--------

 

"Lanting Poetry" volume, handed down Tang Liu Gongquan book, silk book, running book, vertical 26.5 cm, horizontal 365.3 cm.

Volume Explanation of Lanting Poetry

This picture has no stamp.

In the front of the volume, the title of the Qing Emperor Qianlong's calligraphy is "the style of pen admonition" and the title is "the fourth of the eight pillars of Lanting" with a paragraph inscribed. There is also a thin gold inscription "Tang Liu Gongquan Shuqun Xianshi".

After the volume, there are postscripts and inscriptions on Xing Tianzhong, Yang Xifu, Xi Zhi, Cai Xiang (later added), Li Yiyi, Sun Danian, Wang Yi, Huang Bosi (pseudo), Song Shi, Wanqing King of Jin, Shizhen Wang of Ming (two paragraphs), Mo Shilong, Wenjia, Zhang Fengyi and Wang Hongxu of Qing Dynasty.

There are the Imperial Book, Shuanglong, Xuanhe, Zhenghe, Neifu Books, Fenghua Treasure, Neifu Books, Ruisidong Pavilion in Song Dynasty, Shaoxing in Song Dynasty, Chengshi in Qiao Dynasty and Kejiusi in Yuan Dynasty, Wang Shizhen in Ming Dynasty, Gaoshiqi in Qing Dynasty, Wang Hongxu in Qianlong in Neifu Dynasty.

his biography was written by Liu Gongquan on March 3, 353, the ninth year of Yonghe, Emperor Mudi of the Eastern Jin Dynasty. Wang Xizhi, Xie An, Sun Chuo and others gave 37 poems and prefaces at the Lanting rally in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province.

Some of the inscriptions and postscripts after the poem are authentic and some are fake. After the Ming Dynasty, the inscriptions and postscripts were original. Before the Ming Dynasty, the inscriptions and postscripts were authentic except Cai Xiang and Huang Bosi, but they were all matched after the Ming Dynasty, and had nothing to do with this volume.

The brushwork of this volume is rigid and rough, with many withered edges, but it is easier than nature. Huang Bosi's last Title (pseudo) in the Song Dynasty, Zhongyun's "Chuanliushu". On a mesoscopic level, the use of individual characters is obviously not from Liushu, such as "Xie" in Sun Tong's Four-character Poetry, "Ze" in Yu You's Four-character Poetry, and "Foot" in Wang Lianzhi's Four-character Poetry. The structure of these words is also unstable and impetuous. They are also quite different from those in Wang Zhili Tie, written by Liu Shi. The comparison of the inscriptions and postscripts is not only different in style, but also in connection. There are many similarities in poetry and prose, such as mistaking Sun Chuo's four-character poem "Huaibei Logging" for "Huaibei Daishui" and Xie An's four-character poem "Yixifu Zi" for "Yixi ancestor Zi". "Logging" is the Chinese language in the Book of Songs, and "Confucius" refers to Confucius, which shows that the writer is a person who is not proficient in writing and ink. No matter from the artistic characteristics or artistic level, this volume is not Liu Gongquan's pen.

This volume is not a copy from the late Song Dynasty. From the 37 poems recorded, we can see that some words are not taboo in Song Dynasty, such as "Xuan" in Xie'an's poems, "Qici Xuanzhi, Buddhist Lin Qiu", and "Lang" in Wang Suzhi's poems such as "Jiahui Xinshi You, Happy Heart and Spirit" have not evaded the taboo of Zhao Xuanlang, the ancestor emperor of Northern Song Dynasty. Judging from the main style of calligraphy, it is speculated that it should be written in the Tang Dynasty, which is roughly similar to Du Mu's ink work Zhang Hao Poetry Volume, and that it is a straight book, not a copy. As an ancient copy of the Tang Dynasty, this volume has the same literary value as the scrolls of Wenxuan Lu Ji's short songs and lines (Bo 2554) and the second scroll of Yutai's new chanting volume (Bo 2503), not only in calligraphy.

Song Baozhang Waiting for Visit Records, Ming Dongtu Xuanlan, Qinghe Painting and Calligraphy Fang, Qinghe Wenwen Watch, Qing Coral Net Bibliography, Classical Ancient Hall Collection of Calligraphy and Painting, Daguanlu, Shiqu Baoji Continuation and Shiqu Essays.

注:本站发表的所有内容均为原作者或投稿者的观点,不代表本站的立场,请浏览者自行判断取舍,若有观点错误或侵权等信息请联系管理员删除,谢谢配合!转发请标注:美术网(meishu.com) ,多谢支持!本文网址:https://www.meishu.com/zsk/zuopin/3/2019-06-21/2484.html
陈了了
李小可
马海方
孙温
王元友
侯一民
徐悲鸿
廖静文
齐白石
吴冠中
历史上唐朝时的社会到底有多开放?
人民日报刊文:性教育不是洪水猛兽 应坦然面对
为了画“春宫图”,刘海粟敢跟孙传芳打擂台
这样浪漫的吻只需一次,人间爱情油画
画春宫图的高手,唐伯虎一生足够传奇!
一代帝王-宋太宗让画师现场画秘戏图
如何学术性地欣赏春宫画?
揭秘唐伯虎为什么画这么多“春宫图”?
你以为浮世绘里只有秘戏图?
因“春宫图”一炮而红,朱新建画的美女!